MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL Wichita, Kansas, June 27, 1995 Tuesday, 9:11 A.M. The City Council met in regular session with Mayor Knight in the Chair. Council Members Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers; present. Council Member Cather absent. Paul Steinbrenner, Assistant City Manager; Gary Rebenstorf, Director of Law; Tom Schneider, Deputy City Clerk; present. The invocation was given by Pastor Michael McGuire, Bethany United Methodist Church. The pledge of allegiance to the flag was participated in by the Council Members, staff, and guests. Minutes -- The minutes of the regular meeting of June 20, 1995, were -- approved approved 6 to 0. (Cather absent) AWARDS AND PRESENTATIONS AWARD The Mayor's Council for Excellence in Business Award was presented. PUBLIC AGENDA COMMENTS BY FRAN CROWLEY PERTAINING TO CHISHOLM CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION. Fran Crowley Fran Crowley, Chisholm Creek Neighborhood Association, stated that the Chisholm Creek Neighborhood Association is interested in using recent legislation to make redeveloping the shopping center at 21st and Oliver more economically feasible. SANCHO, a non-profit organization, hired a firm to research what could be done with the shopping center and if the research indicates the shopping center needs to be redeveloped, the Chisholm Creek Neighborhood Association and other interested parties would like to submit a plan to get the commercial area designated as a neighborhood revitalization area. If the Neighborhood Association submits a plan under this legislation to the City Council, the City would need to set up agreements with Sedgwick County and USD 259 regarding the rebate structure, and a process for consideration of redevelopment plans. The Neighborhood Association asked the Council to consider making use of the legislation possible for revitalization of the City. Council Member Rogers Council Member Rogers stated there are concerned citizens throughout District I offering increasing input into the operation of the city. Staff has been asked to look into the possibility of a neighborhood revitalization designation for the area under discussion. The legislation referenced by the speaker basically adjusts the tax structure and cooperation between the school district and the county is vital. According to the legislation, once an area receives the designation, the appraised value is used and any improvements to the property are rebated so the appraised value remains essentially the same as it was prior to the improvements. The Council is encouraged to seriously consider a pilot program in the area. Council Member Cole Council Member Cole said that a pilot program undertaken by the Kansas League of Cities will have some very good results to share with the Council. The program focuses in very positive ways on areas that need help. Council Member Kamen Council Member Kamen emphasized the need of solving the problems of groundwater contamination and asbestos abatement before other programs are possible. Legislatures need convincing that special assessments or some other alternative be used to pay for problems such as asbestos abatement. As long as there is a threat of groundwater contamination, banks will not loan money. There are problems in many parts of the city which are growing, making it necessary for a policy to deal with these type of situations. UNFINISHED BUSINESS WATER LINE AGMT. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR WATER SUPPLY LINE TO CROSS THE ARKANSAS RIVER. Continued from June 6, 1995. Paul Steinbrenner Assistant City Manager reviewed the Item. Agenda Report No. 95-469 A. On June 6, 1995, the City Council moved that this item be deferred until staff and the Mayor visit with Sedgwick County to see whether an alternate route can be found. The initial design contract was based on the assumption that the proposed water line could be attached to the existing bridge over the Arkansas River. The bridge is owned by Sedgwick County. A letter dated June 13, 1995, was received from the Sedgwick County Bureau of Public Services. It stated that the County cannot reverse its decision because any drilling and anchoring into the pre-stressed strands will damage the structural integrity of the bridge. Therefore, it will be necessary for Savoy, Ruggles & Bohm, P.A. (SRB) to survey and design an alternate routing of the line under the river. SRB has requested an additional fee of $3,500 to survey and design this alternate route. A Supplemental Agreement with SRB to design the river crossing has been prepared. Payment to SRB will be on a lump sum basis of $3,500 and will be paid from Water Utility funds included in the 1995 Capital Improvement Program (W-6, Unidentified Water Mains). Mayor Knight Mayor Knight inquired if anyone wished to be heard and no one appeared. Motion -- Knight moved that the Supplemental Agreement be approved and the Mayor be -- carried authorized to execute. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) TYLER RD. REALIGNMENT TYLER ROAD REALIGNMENT FROM 31ST STREET SOUTH TO MACARTHUR ROAD. (DISTRICT V) Continued from June 6, 1995. Paul Steinbrenner Assistant City Manager reviewed the Item. Agenda Report No. 95-446 A. At a workshop this year, the City Council considered a proposal to realign Tyler Road to facilitate the development of a proposed industrial park. The project was to be funded 50% by the City and 50% by Special Assessments. On June 14, 1995, the County Commission considered the proposal and agreed to finance that portion of the roadway located outside the City limits. The County's financing proposal does not include special assessments. At this time, the developer has not signed a petition that assesses 50% of the project cost to his property. There are two alternates proposed for relocating Tyler Road and the connection of 31st Street South. Both alternates have the same alignment for Tyler Road but different configurations for 31st Street South. At this time, it is proposed to leave 31st Street South in its current alignment and only relocate Tyler Road. Any adjustments in the alignment of 31st Street South can be addressed at the time of platting. The developer has requested that the City pay 100% of the cost within the City limits. The original estimated project cost for the portion of Tyler Road within the City limits is $350,000 to be paid 50% by the City and 50% by the developer. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris stated that the County acted on this issue within the last two weeks and the necessary action by the Council at this time would be to endorse the City's portion of the project and determine some type of financing mechanism. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight inquired if anyone wished to be heard. Bob Kaplan Bob Kaplan, representing Gary Stevenson, who lives north of 31st Street and west of Tyler Road, enumerated several objections to the project: 1) The project is extremely ill-advised; 2) There is no rationale for the project; 3) The project is not warranted from a traffic engineering standpoint in that main trafficways should not be taken through industrial parks ; 4) It is entirely a developer's project; 5) The project is a violation of law without a public hearing before the MAPC. Mr. Kaplan further stated that Mr. Dugan is being given a $200,000 credit for dedication of right-of-way when the property would have to be dedicated anyway when it is platted. The County approved the project subject to a review by the MAPC set for July 13, 1995. KDOT has not yet bid the paving project, therefore hasty action is not necessary. James Hansen James Hansen appeared on behalf of Tom Baalmann, who lives north of K-42 and west of Tyler Road. Mr. Baalmann currently has access to K-42 out of his driveway, allowing access to the west. K-42 is presently having a median installed and is being expanded to four lanes. If Tyler Road is relocated, KDOT will not permit any crossovers for the residents; subsequently, traffic from the west will be prevented from turning into Mr. Baalmann's area because of the median on K-42. Traffic will be forced to go to MacArthur Road and over to Hoover, causing a four to five mile out-of-the-way trip. Mr. Hansen said a proper study was not completed for the project and questioned the action being undertaken presently. Notice was not given to enable public input. If the project goes through, this acuity of access to Mr. Baalmann's property and his neighbors' property amounts to a taking under eminent domain. There ought to be a public hearing to determine if the access is being taken for the public good or if it is being taken for the benefit of one citizen to the detriment of another. Mr. Hansen, responding to a question, stated that with the median on K-42, access into his client's property from the west will not be possible even without the realignment of Tyler Road, but traffic will be allowed to make a U-turn at Tyler Road to access the driveway. Gary Stevenson Gary Stevenson, who lives north of the proposed industrial park, said it appears that the project would only help the developer and the re-routing of Tyler Road is only to facilitate development and increase the value of the industrial park property. The assessed value of the property and the total tax revenue per year indicates that the benefit to the City would be small and it would take many years to pay back the cost of the project. As best can be determined, there are no plans for, nor anyone looking at, the property. To expect the road to be paid for by property tax in the next ten to fifteen years is unrealistic. Alternative routes should be looked at to help out the Mid-Continent Industrial Park. Running an arterial road through the industrial park will result in unbelievable congestion at Tyler and K-42. Mr. Stevenson stated that prior to building his house, he checked the comprehensive plan which showed that the property would remain rural residential and indicated nothing about moving Tyler. The airplane traffic directly west of the airport is not very loud, but moving the road would increase the noise and smell from the airplanes. Grant Tidemann Grant Tidemann, real estate broker with J.P. Weigand, spoke to the issue of economic development. He currently has two clients desiring to relocate businesses close to the airport. There are a limited supply of land parcels that are zoned, which have the necessary infrastructure and are for sale. The realignment of Tyler Road and additional access to K-42 are critical to the economic growth of the area. Steve Fry Steve Fry, General Manager of an aircraft manufacturing company located within the Mid-Continent Industrial site, stated that from a businessman's standpoint, the traffic has been getting worse over the last several years. Basically, the two ways to access the company's site are from K-42 and from MacArthur. It would be helpful to the business to have better ingress and egress, whatever road may be built in the area, for access off of K-42. There are many ways to solve the problem, Tyler being one of them. Loren Johnson Loren Johnson, 8701 W. 36th St. South, Valleyview Addition, surveyed his neighborhood and found no opposition to relocating Tyler Road. Reduction of traffic and better access are probable end results of the project being undertaken. Tyler Road running south from K-42 will have access to the east and west, so there should be no obstruction to interfere with travel except during the construction period. Residents of the area are concerned about the cost and the amount of tax involved. An arterial street is paid for by an at-large tax, so everyone would pay and in this case, the tax would probably be minimal. Further, residents expressed concern whether there would be any obstructions restricting traffic. Responding to a question, Mr. Johnson stated that there will be ability to make a turn-around at Tyler Road. Mayor Knight momentarily absent, Vice Mayor Kamen in the chair. Bill Jack Bill Jack, CEO of Custom Cupboards, Inc., said his business needs access to K-42 from the industrial park other than only at Maize Road and the proposed realignment would be beneficial. Bill Johnson Bill Johnson, Vice President and General Manager of Evans Building Company at 9801 York, spoke about a survey of the industrial park businesses. Approximately 1,200 to 1,500 people are presently on the job in this area and traffic has been funneled mostly through Maize Road at K-42. With K-42 becoming four lanes with no crossovers at MacArthur once the project is completed, additional traffic will be funneled up through Maize Road, compounding the problem. The area in contention is rapidly growing, requiring good roads coming into it. When Mid-Continent was originally developed, the possibility of having an additional access that would have entered straight north of where Norman is currently located was considered. This access could not be accomplished because there were railroad tracks that had to be crossed, but the necessary crossing was denied by the Railroad. The railroad tracks are now abandoned, providing an opportune time to connect Norman to K-42 as originally planned. With the realignment of Tyler, the City-owned airport properties currently on the west side of Tyler would be available to users desiring direct access to the runway. From an economic standpoint, 50 or 60 acres more added to the airport would be a plus. The negative impact on property owned by the residents on the north side of K-42 was caused by the State. Regarding concerns about emergency vehicles' access to the residences, the realignment of Tyler would quicken emergency response time because of better access to Mid-Continent Industrial Park. Tom Baalmann Tom Baalmann, 9620 S.W. Boulevard, stated that his house is one of the four homes directly west of the existing Tyler Road. The realignment would, in effect, put the homes in the southwest corner of the airport and the residents would be unable to access a major intersection 150 yards away. The Goddard School District will not allow their busses to cross an unmarked and uncontrolled intersection. Although it has been stated that the old Tyler Road would remain open, the intersection would be uncontrolled. Mr. Baalmann suggested other changes that could be considered in lieu of the realignment project and asked that the Council give consideration to the four families involved. KDOT has stated that there would be no crossovers and that they have no plans of changing their design. Before any action is taken, the Item should be sent back to the MAPC. Elsie May Elsie May, who lives in the first house west of Tyler, stated her opposition to moving Tyler. The realignment would cause the affected residences to be right next to the road and airport. There is no benefit except to the owner of the property behind her property. The Item should go back to the MAPC for further discussion. Louanna Cushenberry Louanna Cushenberry, who owns one of the four residences discussed previously, said the only thing determined from KDOT was that if Tyler Road was moved to the west, the intersection of the old Tyler Road going south would be closed. In order to turn around, the residents would have to go to Ridge Road, which is an uncontrolled intersection and poses unsafe traffic conditions. An issue that has not been raised is whether or not any safety studies have be done on this project. The number of accesses to Tyler allowed to the industrial park should be discussed since traffic moving through the area will have to contend with semi-trailer trucks entering and leaving the roadway. The developer seems to be the only one benefiting from the realignment, as residents in the area will face lower property values caused by the proximity of the road to their property, increased noise levels, and fumes from trucks. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris pointed out that every business person and every resident that spoke are in the county, not in the city, and the County has already decided what their course of action is after a public hearing. The City is not being asked to re-invent the project, but whether the City is willing to concur with the portion that is in the city limits. The law states that the hearing must be held before there is construction of a road, not before there is approval of a road. The County has gone forward to comply with what they believe is the law. Bill McKinley Traffic Engineer, responding to questions, said Alternate B would start moving Tyler Road to the west at 31st Street and would eventually curve back to be at 90 degree angles to K-42 and continue on south to MacArthur Road. Under the K-42 plans, Maize Road would be signalized and Tyler Road would be signalized no matter the location. Some of the pros of the realignment are: the owners of private land would be able to have a greater potential for development; the airport would have a greater area within their fenced area; and the realignment would connect to MacArthur Road and would remove a segment of Tyler Road that will need rehabilitation in the near future. If the Item is approved, annexation is recommended and because urban standards is one of the requirements of annexation, the industrial park would be allowed to develop to meet those standards. The cons include: a greater travel distance for the majority of motorists using Tyler Road, especially traffic to and from the major traffic generators like Lear Jet and Cessna; the proposed intersection with K-42 would be a cross- intersection instead of the existing T-intersection that currently exists and has four times the potential conflict points than that of a T-intersection, from a motorist's point of view; the new alignment would be more curved, resulting in reduced speeds and a potential for more accidents; and existing homes would be closer to Tyler road than they are currently. If the Item is approved and the area replatted as industrial, access would be limited to mainline Tyler and industrial access would be off of 31st Street with accel/decel lanes which have to be provided as part of the 31st Street improvement. Traffic Engineering recommends that if the City pays for the relocation of Tyler Road, the developer agrees to dedicate all needed right-of-way for this project both in the City and the County; agrees to the annexation by December 31, 1996; and pays all costs associated with relocation of 31st Street South as part of the developer's platting process and any accel/decel lanes required along Tyler. If the developer fails to do any of the requirements, the developer will pay 100 per cent of the City's costs associated with Tyler Road relocation. The ideal situation KDOT prefers is mile spacing between major intersections and mile spacing for signalization. Under the present KDOT plans, there would be a crossover on Tyler Road that extends further to the south. The proposed K-42 plan is a split roadway with the median varying up to 40 feet in width and in locations along there, it would be safe to make a U-turn at an open intersection. KDOT has let the grading contract on K-42 from the Cessna area to past Schulte. Surveying is taking place and grading will begin soon if it has not already been started. After the grading is completed, KDOT will let the paving contract. The roadway has to be prepared to a certain elevation before paving can begin. Currently, the roadway is designed so that both the eastbound and westbound lanes are banked in the curved area of K-42. It is important that a decision be made by the Council because to accommodate an intersection with Tyler Road with the offset banking of K-42, a re-design is necessary before the grading can be done. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris stressed the importance of the time frame at hand and that action should be taken immediately or not at all. A memorandum from staff indicates that if only the developer's property were annexed, the City's portion of the new tax revenue would be $25,698 per year. Annexing this particular property will allow the City, if it so chooses, to begin annexing other adjacent property, including some of the industrial area. Revenue to the City from the totality of annexed property in this area would be $146,134 per year, even without any development. In answer to statements that the City could annex the property because it would be required at the time of platting, the City had nothing to do with the entire zoning that was approved by the County. Most of the opposition seems to be regarding the zoning issue. If the zoning is denied, the area will not be annexed by the City for a number of years unless annexation is requested. "I would agree completely with Mr. Mckinley's requirements that the property be annexed by December 31, 1996, because then even if that development never occurs in an industrial state, the City will still continue to gain the revenues. My interest all along has been in bringing in that vacant area and the industrial parks into the City limits. I believe they are currently using City services, streets, roads; they are gaining a benefit from being on the periphery of the City and that my analysis of this all along has been that they are gaining City benefit without paying City taxes. I concur with the recommendations of Mr. McKinley." Council Member Ferris clarified that this project is County designed and that if the project went before the MAPC and was denied, KDOT already has the plans for which they could continue the course of action they are currently undertaking. The design will not be completed before the MAPC hearing is conducted. The timing issue with the MAPC should not be too much of a distress. There are two ways to approach the project. It can be done as a 50 per cent City/developer project or it can be done as a 100 per cent City project, to get it moved forward, with added specific requirements on the developer. If the developer did not meet the requirements, he would have to pay 100 per cent, provided the property is annexed. The project is an economic development project for the City insofar as the City would be building a road that would be bringing property within the corporate city limits, property that would not necessarily be able to be brought within the City otherwise. The net dollar gain would be significant to the City. The total return to the City could be as little as $25,000 per year if nothing is developed or as much as $148,000 per year if nothing is developed by the time the steps of annexation are accomplished. The City would bond the $350,000 cost of the project and would be paying $35,000 per year on that amount. There would be an immediate $26,000 per year in tax revenue without annexing any property but that which was requested immediately. The $9,000 difference per year would be quickly made up when the adjacent property is annexed. Bill McKinley Traffic Engineer, responding to questions, stated that with the grading contract having been let, the contractor could move from west to east, but eventually there would be the need to know what to do with the dirt in the area Tyler Road will be moved to to bring the grade up to where it needs to be. The actual construction could begin immediately unless the contract contains limits to the contrary. A 24-hour traffic count of the portion of Tyler south of Kellogg in the City limits revealed a flow of 5,000 to 8,000 cars. The K-42 area would probably show a count of 5,000 cars. The traffic will continue to increase on Tyler and it does have heavy peaks in the mornings and evenings because of the aircraft plant traffic. With the realignment, school buses have other alternatives on their routing. Emergency vehicles could utilize the depressed grass median to cross, depending upon the weather conditions. The roadway would be improved considerably because of safety improvements on K-42. Part of the improvements are to limit the direct access to K-42 as much as possible. Travel time through the area will be improved and with the signalization, delays will be shortened. Gary Rebenstorf City Attorney, responding to a question, stated that according to state statute, an improvement cannot be constructed until it has been to the MAPC. The City Council could include the City's portion in the review process with the County meeting on July 13, 1995, and therefore be in compliance with state law. Mayor Knight momentarily absent, Vice Mayor Kamen in the chair. Marvin Krout Director of Planning, responding to questions, said the concern voiced about aircraft approaching nearby homes gets into the zoning issue which was County approved and is being contested. As a part of the zoning approval, the owner offered restrictions that would prevent direct approach by aircraft as long as there are residences in the area. Over time, because of the proximity to the airport and being next to K-42 which is being designed as a high speed, limited access roadway with direct connections to the freeway network and access to the airport, the residential properties will likely re-develop for industrial/commercial uses. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris re-stated that the zoning case is in the courts and the courts will decide the suitability of various covenants and buffers. Gary Rebenstorf City Attorney, responding to questions, said the Council could cover the issue of buffers in the motion. If the Council wishes to approve the realignment, the Council could ask that the County process include the City's considerations; approval by the Council would then be in compliance with state statute. If the City complies with the MAPC hearing, the action would be before the construction as specified in state statute. Bill McKinley Traffic Engineer, responding to a question, said that there is some time, but maybe not a whole lot of time, to delay action. The County is going to design the project and has a consulting engineer that is willing to make the necessary changes, but the changes have to be done soon so that the grading contractor's work can be done during the contract time period. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris emphasized that the County and not the City is undertaking the Tyler Road project, that the City is only paying for the portion in the city limits as requested by the County. The timing element is a moot point in that the project can be stopped if the MAPC is against it since it is impossible for the road to be designed by July 13, 1995. If the County decides not to go forward with the project, the City Council's approval would not hold up since the realignment is a County project. Motion -- Ferris moved that the city authorize the County to design and construct a portion of a realigned Tyler Road within the City limits of Wichita in conjunction with Alternate "B" with the following conditions: 1. That annexation of all of the property owned by the Dugan family within the boundaries [of a map shown by staff] would be requested and annexed by December 31, 1996. 2. Upon platting the property (east of Maize, south of 31st, north of K-42, and west of Tyler Road) there would be a full dedication of right-of-way of a realigned 31st street in conjunction with staff's analysis of where that road should be. 3. That there would be full payment of 31st Street by the developer, including any necessary accel/decel lanes and that would be at the time of platting. 4. That there be covenants presented also in the documents that would adequately buffer, in the Planning's staff's mind, the houses along K-42 from the light industrial development to the north. If these requirements are not met, the full amount of the City's portion of Tyler Road will be paid by the developer of this property that this goes through. The MAPC should look at the portion that is in the City at the hearing on July 13, 1995, and analyze that and if their recommendation is to not go forward with this project, this would return on the City Council Agenda the following week. -- carried Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) PROPERTY DISPOSITION PROPOSED SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AT MURDOCK/WABASH. Continued from June 20, 1995. Paul Steinbrenner Assistant City Manager reviewed the Item. The City has received an offer of $16,000 with a $2,000 cash earnest payment from the American Cab Co., who proposes to construct a 3,500 square foot building on the property, as well as twenty parking places. The estimated investment is about $170,000 as compared to Bearing Distributors' estimate of a $200,000 investment on the property. Contact with Bearing Distributors was attempted, but was not successful. If the Council wished to consider the sale to American Cab, staff would finalize the agreement and return it to the Council on the Consent Agenda. Council Member Rogers Council Member Rogers stated that he had called the General Manager of Bearing Distributors three times, but never received a response. Motion -- Rogers moved that the offer from American Cab Company for the property at Wabash and Murdock be accepted. Council Member Kamen Council Member Kamen said a policy is needed for disposing of surplus property so that the affect on neighboring areas and a fair market value are known. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight inquired if anyone wished to be heard and no one appeared. -- carried Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) LONG DISTANCE AWARD OF BID FOR LONG DISTANCE SERVICE. Continued from June 20, 1995. Paul Steinbrenner Assistant City Manager reviewed the Item. Ray Trail Director of Finance reviewed the City's process of solicitation of bids. Council Member Kamen momentarily absent. Responding to questions, Mr. Trail stated that the contract is an annual contract, as set out in Kansas law, with an option to renew. The same type of contract was in effect with Feist Long Distance for the last two years. The option to renew with Feist for an additional year existed, however there was the opportunity to get a better price. The bid due date was never extended. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight inquired if anyone wished to be heard. Roberta Feist Roberta Feist, President of Feist Long Distance, said Feist gave the most cost-effective lowest bid. LDM's proposal does not have SS7. With SS7 calls, calls will connect in one to four seconds on average as compared to five to thirteen with LDM's service. This difference equates to 13 hours per month in lost productivity and does not include busy signals and no answers. The cost to the City will be $130 per month in lost productivity. In the bidding requirements, the carrier was to demonstrate financial stability. LDM is a new business only licensed since May 19, 1995. The City should take this into account and reconsider and award the bid to Feist. Bobby Alexander Bobby Alexander, President of Long Distance Management (LDM), explained that LDM is in the process of implementing SS7 at this time. SS7 was just hooked up at Feist 60 days ago. LDM was approved in Kansas on May 19th; however, LDM has been an operating company in Oklahoma for the last 2½ to 3 years. And, Mr. Alexander started the company that became Feist Long Distance. "I think that we did provide the low bid and that we will offer you excellent service." It is estimated that SS7 will be implemented within the next 30 to 60 days. Ray Trail Director of Finance stated that SS7 technology was not in the City's request for proposals. SS7 technology has been placed on the table by the competing parties post receipt of proposals. Items not specified in the City's requirements would not be considered. Staff did verify that for all intents and purposes, within a short span of time both parties would be offering the same type of technology and service. This is a very high-tech, rapidly changing area and these kinds of things come on line with great regularity. Motion -- Ferris moved that the proposal of LDM and the contract be approved and the Mayor -- carried be authorized to sign the contract. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) NEW BUSINESS ADDENDUM ITEM LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE. Paul Steinbrenner Assistant City Manager reviewed the Item. On June 20, 1995, in Workshop Session, the Council heard a presentation with regard to the landscape ordinance. Consensus of the Council was that this Item should be brought to the Council for referral to the Metropolitan Area Planning Commission for review. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight inquired if anyone wished to be heard and no one appeared. Motion -- Kamen moved that the landscape ordinance to the MAPC for a public hearing. Council Member Kamen Council Member Kamen suggested the MAPC address the following issues: 1) It is capped at 3 percent. 2) If landscaping reduces the parking in a square foot type of situation. (i.e.; 200 s.f. of landscaping required; the parking required would be reduced by the same amount.) 3) In the central business district, parking priorities would cause exemption of certain areas from the landscape requirements. Council Member Cole Council Member Cole supported Council Member Kamen's request that the MAPC address the above listed issues as long as it is clear the issues are the recommendation of one person. -- carried Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) RECESS The City Council recessed at 11:35 a.m. and returned at 11:48 a.m. CENTRAL (I-235 TO ZOO) DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS TO CENTRAL FROM I-235 TO ZOO BOULEVARD. Paul Steinbrenner Assistant City Manager reviewed the Item. Agenda Report No. 95-525. The year 2020 Transportation Plan as well as the 1995/1996 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) contain projects to widen Central to a five-lane width from I-235 to McLean and a six-lane width from Tyler to I-235. With the recent decision not to pursue the construction of an additional arterial street crossing of I-235 and the Big Ditch, the construction of improvements to Central, as well as suggested improvements to the I-235 and Central interchange, were discussed as improvements that should be constructed in lieu of the I-235/Big Ditch crossing. Improvements to Central from Zoo Blvd. to McLean are currently programmed in the CIP for design to begin in 1995 and construction in 1998. The design of this section was approved earlier this year by the Council and a design firm is under contract to provide design services. The section of Central from I-235 to Zoo Blvd. is shown in the CIP for design in 1997 and construction in year 1998-2000. Staff recommended that the Council authorize beginning the design of this section of Central in 1995. In addition, staff recommended that the Council authorize a drainage study in 1995 that will address draining a section of Central from I-235 to West Street, providing additional drainage capacity for the drainage basin that drains to the existing storm sewer pump station at Maple and I-235, and analyzing the capacity of the current storm sewer system and the pump station that serves this area. Staff recommended the Council authorize 1995 funding in the estimated amounts of $175,000 for the Central design and $40,000 for the drainage basin study. Staff further recommended that the Council go on record with the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) as requesting and supporting improvements to the I-235 and Central interchange. Staff proposed that the $175,000 needed for the Central design in 1995 be funded $80,000 from the 1995 Traffic and Pedestrian Signal project and $95,000 from the $209,000 budgeted for right-of-way in 1995 from the Murdock, Waco to Wabash project. The $40,000 needed for the drainage basin study in 1995 can be funded from anticipated underexpenditures in the Oliver, 25th to 35th Streets North, 1995 right-of-way project. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris said there were two issues: 1) doing the project; and 2) how the project is funded. The project should be moved forward because of the timing with the just completed crossing study and the tremendous need of improving Central that was demonstrated. It is important to move forward immediately so the City can coordinate with the State. It is believed it is unnecessary to take any funds from any other current CIP funded project for this project because there is an excess of $3 million in reserves. The project could be funded from cash reserves and under- expenditures in other capital improvement projects. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight said his only caveat would be that, in terms of reserves, the top priority for reserves in the CIP would probably be the Big Ditch. If cash reserves are to be used, there should be community-wide priorities. Council Member Cole Council Member Cole spoke against taking $95,000 from funds budgeted for right-of-way in 1995 for the Murdock (Waco to Wabash) project. The Council proceeded with the the remainder of the Agenda and then returned to this Item. Discussion and action is shown with the Item.) Ray Trail Director of Finance, responding to a question regarding cash reserves, said the actual cash reserves in the Debt Service Fund as of the end of 1994 was $9.1 million. Projected cash reserves in the Debt Service Fund at the end of 1995 is expected to be approximately $6.8 million (some will be used to pay the State Office Building related projects that had been delayed in debt financing). Generally, in the Debt Service Fund, a cash reserve of approximately 5 percent or less is expected. That amount would be approximately $3 million. There is an approximate $3.8 million available for projects. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris said that, rather than taking from other projects, $40,000 could be taken from the underspendage and $135,000 could be taken from cash reserves. Motion -- Ferris moved that advancing the Central I-235 to Zoo Blvd. design project, a 1995 drainage basin study for the Central project area, and Staff Screening and Selection Committee to select consultants for these projects be authorized, and staff be directed to pursue and support a request to KDOT and FHWA to improve the Central and I-235 interchange. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight stated that the Big Ditch repair would be a high priority item during the budget session and efforts with the County should be started. Ray Trail Director of Finance said, regarding the cash reserves, the Council would have the option to expend the funds as cash, or to undertake some kind of long-term debt financing. The range of options will be before the Council at the time the budget is considered. In the 1995 Budget, in earlier reports to the Council, it was disclosed that an expenditure of "pay-as-you-go" financing out of the Debt Service Fund, to cover the remainder of the City's obligation on the State Office Building (S.O.B.) renovation and the parking garage facility associated with the S.O.B., through temporary notes with immediate pay-off, would be made with a net effect of a draw down of cash in the Debt Service Fund. A current long-term projection is that the Council will have approximately $3.8 million of pay-as-you-go capability in 1996 over and above currently scheduled capital improvement projects. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight said debt service on the State Office Building was factored in years ago. Ray Trail Director of Finance responded that it was factored in with an anticipation that there would have been an earlier bond issue on those costs - which did not occur. This is just the timing of covering the actual debt. Council Member Rogers Council Member Rogers said his concern is the manner in which attempts are made to move items from the Capital Improvement Program from one year to another. The Big Ditch, a number of drainage associated projects, and a number of infrastructure projects have a great priority. One thing that is being overlooked is public safety and there is no idea, at this point, what kind of expenditures and adjustments will have to be made. There is reluctance to go along with this kind of project because there are others with much greater priority. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight stated that there will be some additional requirements to satisfy response times and other features in the community and, "that will be my highest priority." In terms of the General Debt and Interest Fund, this is manageable and has logic to it as it is one of the more pressing challenges in terms of infrastructure in District V. The project will have little effect on the fund in which it will be financed from. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris agreed with the concern on moving items around in the CIP. The CIP is put together with the best information available at the time. A major, extensive study of the corridors was just completed and the conclusion was that there is a greater problem on Central than was originally believed during the initial phases of the CIP. Staff has evaluated the findings of the study and believes that this project should be advanced. There is also, now, the ability to leverage some State funds for the overpass. Council Member Kamen Council Member Kamen emphasized that he also has a list of projects, foremost of which is moving up as soon as possible the building of a firehouse in the northeast section of town. -- carried Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PROCLAMATION PROCLAMATION. -- Ron Holt Day Motion -- carried Knight moved that the proclamation be authorized. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) APPOINTMENTS CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. Art Museum Board (1 appointment - Ferris) Board of Appeals of Air Conditioning, Refrigeration, Warm Air Heating and Boilers (9 appointments) Board of Appeals of Plumbers and Gas Fitters (4 appointments) Board of Code Standards and Appeals (6 appointments - Cather, Cole, Gale, Knight, 2-City Manager) Board of Electrical Appeals (6 appointments) Board of Housing Commissioners (3 appointments - Gale, Kamen, Knight) Board of Park Commissioners (2 appointments - Kamen, Knight) Board of Zoning Appeals (2 appointments - Cole, Knight) Civil Rights and Services Board (3 appointments - Cole, Knight, Rogers) Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities (9 appointments - 1-Cole, Kamen, Rogers; 2-Ferris, Gale, Knight) Community Corrections Advisory Board (2 appointments) Convention and Tourism Committee (1 appointment - Cole) Group Life Insurance Board of Trustees (2 appointments) Human Services Board (2 appointments - Council at large) Library Board (4 appointments - Ferris, Gale, 2- Knight) Metropolitan Transit Authority (1 appointment - Ferris) Police & Fire Retirement Board of Trustees (1 appointment - Gale) Public Art Advisory Board (3 appointments) Sister Cities Advisory Board (2 appointments - Kamen, Knight) Traffic Commission (4 appointments - Cole, Ferris, Gale, Knight) Wichita Airport Authority (2 appointments - Cole, Gale) Wichita Athletic Commission (3 appointments) Wichita Commission on the Status of Women (6 appointments - 2-Ferris, Knight; 1-Gale, Kamen) Wichita Employees Retirement Board (2 appointments - Cole, Ferris) Wichita Public Building Commission (3 appointments - Gale, Kamen, Knight) Wichita-Sedgwick County Alcohol and Drug Abuse Advisory Board (5 appointments) Wichita-Sedgwick County Board of Health (1 appointment - Cole) Wichita Sedgwick County Solid Waste Management Committee (3 appointments - Cole, Gale, Kamen) Appointments will be for terms expiring June 30, 1997. Motion -- Rogers appointed Lawrence Newton, Board of Electrical Appeals; Veronica Triana, Civil Rights and Services Board; Barbara Jackson, Convention & Tourism Committee - rescinded; Charles McAfee, Public Art Avisory Board; Rescinded - Michelle Bias and Vickie Sellars Bias, Appointed - Bridget Clark and Mildred Davis, Wichita Committee on the Status of Women - rescinded; and Laurian Cuffy, ADAAB; and moved -- carried that the appointments be approved. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Motion -- Cole appointed Jim Huntley, Traffic Commission; Janet Thompson, Wichita-Sedgwick County Board of Health; and moved that the appointments be approved. Motion -- carried carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Motion -- Ferris appointed Alisa Phillips, Art Museum Board; Sylvia Sutton Tandy, Commission on the Status of People with Disabilities; Teresa Amaro and Jana Oliver, Wichita Commission on Status of Women; Sonia Greteman, Public Art Advisory Board; and Terry Frye, Employees' Retirement Board; and moved that the -- carried appointments be approved. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Motion -- Kamen appointed Carrie Jones, Board of Housing Commissioners; Bob Borreson, Community Corrections Board; Robert J. Jones, Group Life Insurance Board of Trustees; Marilyn Webb, Sister Cities Advisory Board; Tiffany Rogers, Wichita-Sedgwick County Solid Waste Management Committee; and moved that the -- carried appointments be approved. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Motion -- Gale appointed Howard Rumft, Board of Housing Commissioners; Michael Colgan, Police & Fire Retirement Board of Trustees; Donald Hopkins, Library Board; and -- carried moved that the appointments be approved. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Motion -- Knight appointed Tony Zimbelman, Board of Codes Standards and Appeals; Bob Holgerson, Board of Housing Commissioners; Doug Malone, Board of Zoning Appeals; Paul Rosell, Traffic Commission; and Mary Ann Khoury, ADAAB; and moved that the -- carried appointments be approved. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) CONSENT AGENDA Knight moved that the Consent Agenda, including addendum item, be approved in accordance with the recommended action shown thereon. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) BOARD OF BIDS REPORTS OF THE BOARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS DATED JUNE 19, 1995. At 10:00 a.m., Friday, June 16, 1995, pursuant to advertisements published, bids were received, publicly opened, read aloud and tabulated for the Board of Bids and Contracts: (Ref: Bid analysis report attached to Board of Bids Minutes 6/19/95) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION: SEWERS, PAVING AND WATER MAINS AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Prescott from the southerly line of Lot 28, Block 2 and Lot 17, Block 3, Pawnee Mesa Third Addition to the south line of Prescott Court, all in Pawnee Mesa Third Addition (north of Pawnee, west of Lark). (472-82053/763052/490408) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 09-18-90) (District V) Ritchie Paving - $41,998.50 Hazel from the east line of Lot 51, Block 1 to the east line of Lot 68, Block 1, Stoneborough Addition; Hazel Court from the south line of Hazel to and including the cul-de- sac to serve Lots 56 through 63, Block 3; and Hazel Court from the south line of Hazel to and including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 64 through 71, Block 3, Stoneborough Addition (west of Broadway, north of 55th Street South). (472- 82570/762963/490399) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 03-14-95) (District IV) Ritchie Paving - $143,599.90 (Lump Sum Total Alt #2) 12" Water Supply line along Greenwich from Central to 1400 feet south of Central (Greenwich and Central). (448-88857/632224/544509) Traffic to be maintained through construction using flagpersons and barricades. (Council approval date 12-14-93) (District n/a) Mies Construction Co., Inc. - $36,088.00 Knight moved that the contracts be awarded as outlined above, subject to check, same being the lowest and best bid within the Engineer's construction estimate, and the Mayor be authorized to sign the contract for the City. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT/WICHITA HOUSING AUTHORITY: CHILLER REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT AT MCLEAN MANOR AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Brake Inc. - $83,000.00 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/FLEET & BUILDINGS DIVISION AND WATER DEPARTMENT: AIR COMPRESSOR/TRAILER MOUNTED AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Concrete Accessories - $38,944.00 (Total Net Bid) WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT/SEWAGE TREATMENT DIVISION: RUBBER TRACKED TRACTORS AND TILL AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Group I - Foley Tractor Co. - $237,350.00 (Total Net Bid) Group II - Reject Bids WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT/FILTER PLANT: DIONEX AUTOSAMPLERAS PER SPECIFICATIONS Dionex Corporation - $14,820.00 (Total Net Bid) Less - $ 445.00 (Option 1 - Trade-in) VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS/VARIOUS DIVISIONS: PLUMBING REPAIR SERVICE AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Group I - United Plumbing, Inc. - $37.00 per man per hour Group II - United Plumbing, Inc. - $37.00 per man per hour Knight moved that the contracts be awarded as outlined above, same being the lowest and best bid. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) REPORT OF THE BOARD OF BIDS AND CONTRACTS DATED JUNE 26, 1995. At 10:00 a.m., Friday, June 23, 1995, pursuant to advertisements published, bids were received, publicly opened, read aloud and tabulated for the Board of Bids and Contracts: (Ref: Bid analysis report attached to Board of Bids Minutes 6/26/95) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION: SEWERS, PAVING AND WATER MAINS AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Esthner from the west line of Lark 2nd Addition to the south line of Lot 5, Block A, Lark 2nd Addition; Mars from the south line of Lot 5, Block A, Lark 2nd Addition to the west line of Lot 9, Block B, Lark 2nd Addition; Dora from the west line of Lot 9, Block B, Lark 2nd Addition to the east line of Lark 2nd Addition; and Dora Courts from the north line of Dora to and including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 12 through 31, Block A and from the south line of Dora to and including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 11 through 26, Block B, Lark 2nd Addition (south of Kellogg, east of 119th Street West). (472- 82550/762989/490401) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 03-21-95) (District V) Asphalt Construction - $156,264.70 Lateral 312, Southwest Interceptor Sewer to serve parts of Reflection Ridge 7th & 8th Additions (south of 29th, east of Tyler). (468-82211/742288/480320) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 04-21-92) (District V) Utility Contractors - $103,279.00 Lateral 30, Main 1, Westlink Sewer to serve part of Westfield Acres Addition (north of Maple, west of Tyler). (468-82474/742270/480319) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 05-09-95) (District V) WB Carter Construction Co., Inc. - $15,146.00 Lateral 57, Main 22, War Industries Sewer to serve Home Design Center Addition (north of 29th, east of Rock Road). (468-82052/742296/480321) Traffic to be maintained through construction. (Council approval date 04-10-90) (District II) Nowak Construction - $38,102.00 (Total Alternate A) Mt. Carmel from the north line of 16th Street North to the south line of 17th Street North, in Sheridan Acres Addition, et. al. (between 16th and 17th Streets North). (472- 82509/762880/490391) Traffic to be maintained through construction using flagpersons and barricades. (Council approval date 11-01-94) (District VI) Cornejo & Sons - $52,128.50 Water Distribution System improvements at the intersection of Meridian and McCormick and along McCormick from Meridian to St. Clair (Meridian & McCormick). (448-88835 & 448-88803/633479/544574) Traffic to be maintained through construction using flagpersons and barricades. (Council approval date 12-14-93) (Districts IV & VI) WB Carter Construction Co., Inc. - $54,704.00 (Subtotal Bid Item 88835) $42,442.00 (Subtotal Bid Item 88803) $97,146.00 (Aggregate Total Bid Items) Knight moved that the contracts be awarded as outlined above, subject to check, same being the lowest and best bid within the Engineer's construction estimate, and the Mayor be authorized to sign the contract for the City. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/FLEET & BUILDINGS DIVISION AND WATER DEPARTMENT/SEWAGE TREATMENT DIVISION: TRACTORS AND MOWERS AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Group I - Caldwell Equipment Co., Inc. - $176,829.48 Group II - Maximum Tractor & Machinery, Inc. - $ 53,999.94 Group III - Defer One Week PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/FLEET & BUILDINGS DIVISION: SKID-STEER LOADERS AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Group I - Reject Bids Group II - AAA Equipment & Supply - $12,591.00 (Total Net Bid) - $ 4,997.00 (Option 1 per vehicle) - $ 2,581.00 (Option 2 per vehicle) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/FLEET & BUILDINGS DIVISION: TRAILER MOUNTED PRESSURE APPLICATOR AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Paving Maintenance Supply, Inc. - $29,961.00 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/MAINTENANCE DIVISION: TRASH RECEPTACLES AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Riggs Recreation Equipment, Inc. - $14,550.00 (Total Net Bid) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/FLEET & BUILDINGS DIVISION: TELESCOPING STEEL SIGN POST SYSTEM AS PER SPECIFICATIONS Xcessories Squared Device & Mfg., Inc. - Item 1 - $ 12.39 per each - Item 2 - $ 14.40 per each - Item 3 - $ 16.20 per each - Item 4 - $18.00 per each - Item 5 - $21.45 per each - Item 6 - $ 7.20 per each - Item 7 - $ 7.85 per each - Item 8 - $ 4.15 per each - Item 9 - $ 4.35 per each - Item 10 - $ .46 per each - Item 11 - $ .45 per each - Item 12 - $ .07 per each Total Net Bid - $29,525.50 Knight moved that the contracts be awarded as outlined above, same being the lowest and best bid. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) LICENSE APPLICATIONS APPLICATIONS FOR LICENSES TO RETAIL CEREAL MALT BEVERAGES. Special Event 1995 L. Thomas Smith Cowboy Club/Summer JamWest Bank Stage Renewal 1995 (Consumption on Premises) Hanh Van Bui Saigon Oriental Restaurant*1103 N. Broadway (Consumption off Premises) Robert J. Bales Klepper Korner Store1401 N. Mosley Wendelin Herman Midway Oil, Inc.4001 S. Seneca *General Retailer--beer sales derive less than 50% of gross revenues. Motion -- Knight moved that the licenses be approved subject to Staff review and -- carried approval. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) PLANS AND SPECS. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. a. The Intersection of K-42 (Southwest Boulevard, Pawnee Avenue, West Street. (472-82477/706028/405156) Traffic to be maintained through construction. (Council approval date 06-28- 95) (District IV) Motion -- Knight moved that the plans and specifications be approved and the City Clerk be instructed to advertise for bids to be submitted to the Board of Bids and -- carried Contracts by 10:00 a.m., June 30, 1995. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) b. Storm Water Sewer #434 to serve Reflection Ridge Seventh and Eighth Additions (south of 29th Street North, east of Tyler). (468-82213/750646/485100) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 04-21-92) (District V) c. Storm Water Sewer #459 to serve Reflection Ridge Seventh and Eighth Additions (south of 29th, west of Ridge). (468-82460/750653/485101) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 03-21-95) (District V) d. Water Distribution System to serve Reflection Ridge Seventh Addition (south of 29th Street North, west of Ridge). (448-88899/732719/470349) Traffic to be maintained through construction using flagpersons and barricades. (Council approval date 03-21-95) (District V) e. Water Supply Line to serve Prairie Woods Addition (north of Pawnee, east of Maize). (448- 88907/732628/470340) Traffic to be maintained through construction using flagpersons and barricades. (Council approval date 03-21-95) (District V) f. Tee Time from the south line of Lot 5, Block 3, Reflection Ridge Seventh Addition and the south line of Lot 39, Block 1, Reflection Ridge Eighth Addition to the south line of 29th Street North; Meadow Park Circle from the west line of Tee Time to and including the cul-de-sac; Meadow Park Court serving Lots 7 through 13, Block 1, Reflection Ridge Eighth Addition; Meadow Park Court serving Lots 14 through 22, Block 1, Reflection Ridge Eighth Addition; Tee Time Court serving Lots 1 through 4, Block 1, Reflection Ridge Eighth Addition; Tee Time Court serving Lots 35 through 39, Block 1, Reflection Ridge Eighth Addition; and Sidewalk on both sides of Tee Time, in Reflection Ridge Eighth Addition (south of 29th, west of Ridge). (472-82562/763045/490407) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 03-21-95) (District V) g. Haskell from the east line of Maize Road to the west line of Prairie Woods with sidewalk on the south side of Haskell; Prairie Woods from the north line of Haskell to the north line of Lot 37, Block 1 with sidewalk on the north side of Prairie Woods; Prairie Woods Court from the south line of Prairie Woods to and including the cul-de-sac; and 6' wide sidewalk in Reserve B from the east line of Prairie Woods to the east line of Prairie Woods Addition (north of Pawnee, east of Maize). (472-82563/762971/490400) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 03-21-95) (District V) h. Meadow Oaks and Pepperwood from the south line of 28th Street North to the west line of Edgemoor Circle; Edgemoor Circle from the north line of Pepperwood to and including the cul-de-sac; Pepperwood Circle from the east line of Edgemoor Circle to the east line of Lot 47, Block 2, Meadow Oaks Addition; Meadow Oaks from the south line of Pepperwood to and including Meadow Oaks Circle; and both Meadow Oaks Courts adjacent to Lots 51 through 54 and Lots 56 through 68 in said Block 2, Meadow Oaks Addition (south of 29th Street North, east of Oliver). (472-82354/762997/490402) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 04-25-95) (District I) i. South Lakes Park excavate approximately a 16-acre pond, place fill material, and softball field at the South Lakes Sports Complex (east of Meridian, between 47th and 55th Streets South). Does not affect existing traffic. (Index Code n/a) (Council approval date 05-04-93) (District IV) Motion -- Knight moved that the plans and specifications be approved and the City Clerk be instructed to advertise for bids to be submitted to the Board of Bids and -- carried Contracts by 10:00 a.m., July 7, 1995. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES. a. Prescott from the southerly line of Lot 28, Block 2 and Lot 17, Block 3, Pawnee Mesa Third Addition to the south line of Prescott Court, all in Pawnee Mesa Third Addition (north of Pawnee, west of Lark) - $59,000.00. (472- 82053/763052/490408) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 09-18-90) (District V) b. Hazel from the east line of Lot 51, Block 1 to the east line of Lot 68, Block 1, Stoneborough Addition; Hazel Court from the south line of Hazel to and including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 56 through 63, Block 3; and Hazel Court from the south line of Hazel to and including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 64 through 71, Block 3, Stoneborough Addition (west of Broadway, north of 55th Street South) - $190,550.00. (472- 82570/762963/490399) Does not affect existing traffic. (Council approval date 03-14-95) (District IV) c. 12" Water Supply line along Greenwich from Central to 1400 feet south of Central (Greenwich and Central) - $69,965.00. (448-88857/632224/544509) Traffic to be maintained through construction using flagpersons and barricades. (Council approval date 12-14-93) (District n/a) d. deleted Motion -- Knight moved that the preliminary estimates be approved and filed. Motion -- carried carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) STATEMENTS OF COST STATEMENTS OF COST (CHESNEY). a. Water Distribution System to serve Great Plains Business Park Second Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $44,378.00. (448-88575/732446/470322) b. Water Distribution System to serve Sterling Farms Fourth Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $27,158.00. (448-88864/732453/470453) c. Water Distribution System to serve Aberdeen First Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $94,091.00. (448-88822/732180/470296) d. Water Distribution System to serve Brookhaven Estates Second Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $45,934.00. (448-88832/732289/470306) e. Water Distribution System to serve The Orchard at Shadybrook Farm. Financing to be issued at this time - $44,569.00. (448-88801/732404/470318) f. Water Distribution System to serve Pioneer Balloon Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $24,117.00. (448-88861/732438/470321) g. Parkridge from the south line of Aberdeen First Addition to the northwest corner of Lot 28, Block 3, of Aberdeen First Addition & Parkridge Court from the Parkridge right-of-way to and including the cul-de-sac in Aberdeen First Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $404,144.00. (472-82442/762468/490349) h. Sidewalk along the South side of 21st Street North from the westerly line of Lot 1, Block 1 to the easterly line of Lot 2, Block 1, Bradley Fair Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $10,233.00. (472-82426/762336/490336) i. Garden Ridge and Garden Ridge Circle from the west line of Lot 25, Block 1 to and including the cul-de- sac; Garden Ridge Court from the south line of Garden Ridge to and including the cul-de-sac, Lake Ridge Second Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $252,957.00. (472- 82350/762153/490318) j. Southbound accel/decel lane on the west side of Rock Road from a point 260 feet north of the centerline of 29th Street to 30th Street Cottonwood Square Addition, now platted as Northrock Crossing. Financing to be issued at this time - $79,916.00. (472-82488/762633/490366) k. Limuel from the south line of Auburn Hills Addition to Maple Street; sidewalk along the west line Limuel to the west line of Lot 1, Block B; and Limuel Court from the north line of Auburn Hills and to and including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 44-49, Block A; Limuel Court from the west line of Auburn Hills to & including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 4-16, Block B; Limuel Court from the north line of Auburn Hills to an including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 31-40, Block A; Limuel Court from the east line of Auburn Hills to & including the cul- de-sac to serve Lots 14-22, Block A; & Limuel Court from the east line of Auburn Hills to & including the cul-de-sac to serve Lots 1-13, Block A, Auburn Hills Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $446,032.00. (472-82459/762484/490351) l. Lateral 51, Main 3, Southwest Interceptor Sewer to serve Vilm Gardens Second Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $7,912.00. (468-82409/742080/480300) m. Lateral 9, Main 14, Southwest Interceptor Sewer to serve VonFeldt Industrial Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $49,753.00. (468-82373/741868/480278) n. Lateral 74, Sanitary Sewer #23 to serve Great Plains Business Park Second Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $42,667.00. (468-82181/742114/480303) o. Lateral 33, Main 15, Southwest Interceptor Sewer to serve Lake Ridge Commercial Second Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $54,095.00. (468- 82427/742197/480311) p. Lateral 85, Sanitary Sewer #23 to serve Pioneer Balloon Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $41,295.00. (468-82411/742106/480302) q. Lateral 243, Southwest Interceptor Sewer to serve Westwind Third Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $22,197.00. (468-81700/742171/480309) r. Lateral 113, Westlink to serve Bradford South Addition and unplatted tracts. Financing to be issued at this time - $204,954.00. (468-82402/742023/480294) s. Water Distribution System to serve Floyd Bailey Second and Third Additions. Financing to be issued at this time - $35,038.00. (448-88800/732164/470294) t. Water Supply Line to serve parts of Sterling Farms Addition and Village Charters Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $74,723.00. (448-88367/732222/470300) u. Water Distribution System to serve Floyd Bailey Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $148,915.00. (448-88829/732156/470293) v. Water Supply Line to serve Sterling Farms Second Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $47,565.00. (448-88715/732271/470305) w. Water Distribution System to serve Bradford South Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $113,247.00. (448-88845/732313/470309) x. Water Distribution System to serve Bradford South Addition and an unplatted tract. Financing to be issued at this time - $56,021.00. (448-88847/732305/470308) y. Water Distribution System to serve Lexington Addition, Phase II. Financing to be issued at this time - $42,147.00. (448-88654/732321/470310) z. Curb and gutter along the north side of Kellogg Drive from the west line of Lot 1 to the east line of Lot 2, The First Credit Union Addition. Financing to be issued at this time - $6,750.00. (472-82333/761825/490285) Motion -- Knight moved that the Statements of Cost be received and filed and the City Clerk be instructed to prepare the proposed assessment rolls. Motion carried -- carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) PETITIONS PETITIONS (100%). Water Distribution System to serve part of Fairlawn Acres on the south side of Irving, west of Reca. (District V) Agenda Report No. 95-526. The signatures on the petition represent 100% of the improvement district. The project will serve a new indoor tennis complex. The estimated project cost is $27,000. The funding source is Special Assessments. Motion -- Knight moved that the Petition be approved and the Resolution be adopted. -- carried Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) RESOLUTION NO. R-95-278 Resolution of findings of advisability and Resolution authorizing construction of Water Distribution System Number 448-88928 (south of Kellogg, east of Tyler) in the City of Wichita, Kansas, pursuant to findings of advisability made by the Governing Body of the City of Wichita, Kansas, presented. Knight moved that the Resolution be adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Yeas: Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers, Knight. SANITARY SEWER TO SERVE PART OF LAKE RIDGE SECOND ADDITION (NORTH OF 21ST, EAST OF RIDGE). District V) Agenda Report No. 95-527. The signature on the Petition represents 100% of the improvement district. The purpose of the new petition is to rephase the sanitary sewer plan for the development to accommodate changes in the home building rate. The estimated project cost is $228,000. The funding source is Special Assessments. Motion -- Knight moved that the Petition be approved and the Resolution be adopted. -- carried Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) RESOLUTION NO. R-95-279 Resolution of findings of advisability and Resolution authorizing construction of Lateral 1, Main 16, SWI (north of 21st, east of Ridge) Project No. 468-82335 in the City of Wichita, Kansas, pursuant to findings of advisability made by the Governing Body of the City of Wichita, Kansas, presented. Knight moved that the Resolution be adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Yeas: Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers, Knight. DECEL LANE ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF 21ST STREET NORTH, WEST OF TYLER. (District V) Agenda Report No. 95-528. The signatures on the petition represent 100% of the improvement district. The deceleration lane will provide safer access and improved traffic flow to a new office/retail/recreational development. The estimated project cost is $130,000. The funding source is Special Assessments. Motion -- Knight moved that the Petition be approved and the Resolution be adopted. -- carried Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) RESOLUTION NO. R-95-280 Resolution of findings of advisability and Resolution authorizing improving of decel lane along the north side of 21st Street North to serve Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 6, including major entrance to Lot 4, Project No. 472-81891 in the City of Wichita, Kansas, pursuant to findings of advisability made by the Governing Body of the City of Wichita, Kansas, presented. Knight moved that the Resolution be adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Yeas: Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers, Knight. BOARDS MINUTES MINUTES OF ADVISORY BOARDS. Board of Appeals of Plumbers and Gas Fitters, 6/6/95 CPO Southeast Council 3, 6/8/96 Convention and Tourism Committee, 4/7/95 Wichita Airport Authority, 6/5/95 Wichita Art Museum Board, 5/25/95 Wichita/Sedgwick County Board of Health, 6/8/95 Motion -- carried Knight moved that the Minutes be received and filed. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) STREET CLOSURES/USES CONSIDERATION OF STREET CLOSURES/USES. There were no street closures considered. EMINENT DOMAIN PYMT. PAYMENT OF APPRAISERS' AWARD, FEES AND COURT COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH EMINENT DOMAIN CASE NO. 95C919. (DISTRICT VI) Agenda Report No. 95-529. On April 3, 1995, the City filed an eminent domain proceeding to acquire two tracts of land in connection with planned improvements to McLean Boulevard. One tract is an easement of approximately 370 square feet along the south side of the residence at 641 N. McLean Boulevard and the other is the entirety of the commercial property at 363 N. McLean Boulevard operated as the Party Kloset. On June 12, 1995, the court-appointed appraisers filed their report in this case. They assessed the damages to Tract #25 (the Party Kloset) at $120,000 for the taking of the entire property. They assessed damages to Tract #27 (641 N. McLean) at $6,000 for the taking of the easement. The court allowed the three appraisers a fee of $750 each for their work and assessed court costs of $66.50 against the City. In order for the City to acquire this property for use in connection with its planned improvements to McLean Boulevard it is necessary for it to pay the sum of $128,316.50 to the Clerk of the District Court on or before July 12, 1995. These costs are to be charged to the capital projects for the improvement of McLean Boulevard and its realignment. If the City wishes to acquire these tracts of land through this eminent domain proceeding it is legally obligated to pay the amount of the appraisers' award, fees and court costs to the Court. Motion -- Knight moved that payment to the Clerk of the District Court of the appraisers' award, fees, and court costs in the total amount of $128,316.50 be authorized. -- carried Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) AIRPORT TERMINAL CAPITAL PROJECT INITIATION - MID-CONTINENT AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING CARPET CARPET REPLACEMENT REPLACEMENT. Agenda Report No. 95-530. The project is Terminal Building Carpet Replacement and represents improvements that will be made to Mid-Continent Airport subject to further action and approval by the Wichita Airport Authority. The project has been included in a Capital Improvement Program of the City of Wichita. This action approves only the intent to use City of Wichita bonding authority in the future and does not specifically authorize the issuance of debt nor does it preclude the use of any substitute funding source. The total cost for the capital improvements, based on the best present information, is $250,000 (an increase of $50,000). Motion -- carried Knight moved that the Resolution be adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) RESOLUTION NO. R-95-281 A supplemental resolution declaring that a public necessity exists for, and that the public safety, service, and welfare will be advanced by, the making of certain capital improvements to the Wichita Mid-Continent Airport Facility operated by the Wichita Airport Authority of the City of Wichita, Kansas, presented. Knight moved that the Resolution be adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Yeas: Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers, Knight. HUGO WALL CONTRACT CONTRACT WITH THE HUGO WALL SCHOOL OF URBAN AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS. Agenda Report No. 95-531. The City of Wichita is the Grant Recipient/Program Administrator for the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) in Service Delivery Area (SDA) IV which includes Butler, Cowley, Harper, Kingman, Sedgwick, and Sumner counties. The Private Industry Council (PIC) of SDA IV provides policy guidance for the use of JTPA funds in this area. The City of Wichita, PIC, and Wichita State University's Hugo Wall School of Urban and Public Affairs have a three party contract, which terminates June 30, 1995, for the Hugo Wall School of Urban and Public Affairs to provide oversight and consulting services for JTPA related activities. The contract would renew the oversight and consulting services contract for one year, July 1, 1995, through June 30, 1996. Terms of the contract include the School's review and analysis of PIC documents and attendance by a representative of the School at PIC meetings, specified PIC committee meetings, and meetings of the Kansas Council on Employment and Training. The School is also to provide consultation with PIC members and facilitate the annual PIC planning retreat. The maximum contract amount is $18,996. JTPA funds are used to pay for contract services and the contract amendment obligates no general fund moneys. Motion -- Knight moved that the Contract be approved and the Mayor be authorized to -- carried execute. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) DESIGN SERVICES DESIGN SERVICES FOR REFLECTION RIDGE SEVENTH AND EIGHTH ADDITIONS. Agenda Report No. 95-532. The City Council approved the Reflection Ridge Seventh and Eighth Additions development on March 21, 1995. The proposed Agreement between the City and Professional Engineering Consultants, P.A. (PEC) provides for the design of Lateral 312, Southwest Interceptor; Storm Water Sewer No. 434; Storm Water Sewer No. 459; Water Distribution System No. 448-88899; and paving Tee Time, Meadow Park Circle, Meadow Park Court; Tee Time Court and sidewalk (south of 29th, west of Ridge). Because PEC provided subdivision engineering services for this addition, it can expedite construction plan preparation. Payment will be on a lump-sum basis not to exceed $79,000 and will be paid by Special Assessments. Motion -- Knight moved that the Agreement be approved and the Mayor be authorized to -- carried execute. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) DESIGN SERVICES FOR PAWNEE AND WEST INDUSTRIAL PARK SECOND ADDITION. Agenda Report No. 95-533. The City Council approved the Pawnee & West Industrial Park Second Addition development on November 8, 1994, and on April 18, 1995. The proposed Agreement between the City and Savoy Ruggles & Bohm, P.A. (SRB) provides for the design of Lateral 11, Main 14, Southwest Interceptor Sewer; Storm Water Drain No. 110; Water Distribution System No. 448-88915; and paving West Street Court and deceleration lane (north of Pawnee, west of West Street). Because SRB provided subdivision engineering services for this addition, it can expedite construction plan preparation. Payment will be on a lump-sum basis not to exceed $27,600 and will be paid by Special Assessments. Motion -- Knight moved that the Agreement be approved and the Mayor be authorized to -- carried execute. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT. Agenda Report No. 95-534. The agreement allows Tramco, Inc. to occupy the public easement and waives all rights of action in law arising out of the encroachment over the easement. In addition, the owners of the property agree to inspect, maintain and repair the sewer until they cease to occupy the easement. The property owners also agree to pay other parties for any increased costs that may accrue due to connecting to that portion of the sewer or easement that the structure is over. Finally, the agreement not only allows the City to be held harmless from claims resulting from leaking, cave-in, or other failures of the sewer, but also allows the City to be held harmless from claims resulting from replacement or upgrade of lines, manholes, and/or other Department property in the easement. Motion -- Knight moved that the Agreement be approved and the Mayor be authorized to -- carried execute. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) LEASE AGREEMENT MODIFICATION/EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT FOR PROPERTY AT 2103 E. 21ST. Agenda Report No. 95-535. On May 22, 1990, the City Council approved a Lease Agreement with Cessna Aircraft Company for the property at 2103 East 21st Street North. The property has since been utilized by Cessna as a learning and training center. The lease calls for Cessna to lease Lot 1 of Conway's Addition to Wichita along with improvements thereon for a period of five years ending May 15, 1995. Cessna has the right to extend the lease for two additional five year periods by giving notice 90 days prior to end of the lease term. The request for extension was not received until May 15, 1995. As notice was not given in a timely manner, it is the opinion of the City Legal Department that City Council action is required to waive the notice period and accept the exercise of the option to extend. Also, the leasehold is all of Lot 1 of Conway's Addition. This lot is not rectangular. There is a 20 foot by 116.62 foot protuberance along the east side of the lot at the southeast corner. This plot is outside Cessna's perimeter fence. Cessna has agreed to a modification of the lease excluding this land from the leasehold. This parcel is needed to provide required parking for the senior center being developed to the east by Mennonite Housing as part of the UNB project. Rent for the option period will be $5,000 per month for the first two years. Rent for the remaining three years will be increased by the increase in CPI over a 1995 base year with a maximum monthly rent of $6,000. Motion -- Knight moved that Cessna's request for extension and the Lease Amendment be approved and the Mayor be authorized to sign the necessary documents. Motion -- carried carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) ADDENDUM ITEM FRANCHISE EXTENSION EXTENSION OF SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. Agenda Report No. 95-539. The current five-year franchise agreement with Southwestern Bell expired by its own terms on June 18, 1994, and was extended by the Council until June 21, 1995. Southwestern Bell and the City have been involved in the negotiations for a new agreement and additional time is needed to complete the agreement. This agreement will extend the current agreement until July 28, 1995, or until a new ordinance takes effect, whichever comes first. It also provides that the new payment schedule will begin upon adoption of the ordinance (without the statutory waiting period). Southwestern Bell has agreed to the extension. Motion -- Knight moved that the Agreement be approved and the Mayor be authorized to -- carried execute. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) CITY HALL PARKING AMENDED BONDING RESOLUTION, AMENDED ARCHITECTURAL CONTRACT AND CONSTRUCTION GARAGE CHANGE ORDER IN CONNECTION WITH CITY HALL PARKING GARAGE. Agenda Report No. 95-538. On June 20, 1995, the City Council determined to proceed with a change in the City Hall Parking Garage project to allow for "managed parking" rather than metered parking. To implement the action of the Council, it is necessary to take the following actions: [1] Amended Bond Resolution -- The original bonding resolution in the amount of $5,840,000 must be increased to $6,005,000. This provides additional funding authority to add the garage features necessary for a managed parking facility. [2] Amended Architectural Contract -- The design services for the garage modifications will add up to $20,000 to the architectural contract. [3] Construction Change Order -- A change order estimated at $207,230 in construction costs increases will be required. The increased costs will be funded from the issuance of general obligation bonds. Motion -- Knight moved that the resolution be adopted and the amended contract and change -- carried order be approved. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) RESOLUTION NO. R-95-282 A Resolution amending Resolution No. R-94-423 by increasing the bonding authority in Section 4 of Resolution No. R-92-377 from $5,840,000.00 to $6,005,000 pertaining to constructing the new City Hall Parking Garage, presented. Knight moved that the Resolution be adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Yeas: Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers, Knight. FIRE FACILITY AMENDING BOND ORDINANCE FOR FIRE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIRS. Agenda Report No. 95-536. On May 24, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution Number R-94-222, a bonding resolution authorizing acquisition of certain fire-fighting exhaust extraction equipment, boilers, and to perform roof and concrete repairs. The statute cited in the Resolution, K.S.A. 12- 110c, applies only to the acquisition and financing of actual fire fighting equipment and does not, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, apply to capital improvements to fire station facilities. To correct defects in the authorizing procedures, Bond Counsel requests that the City Council adopt the bonding ordinance which supplements the action taken in 1994. The new ordinance authorizes the project and its bonding under K.S.A. 12-1736 et seq., the public building statutes. The fire station repair project is part of the current general obligation bond issue. Final adoption and publication of the Ordinance will be timed to precede the bond closing date. Motion -- Knight moved that the Ordinance be placed on first reading. Motion carried -- carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) ORDINANCE An Ordinance of the City of Wichita, Kansas, authorizing modifications and repairs to public buildings, and authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds for the purpose of financing the costs thereof; and supplementing Resolution No. R-94-222 of the City,introduced and under the rules laid over. ORDINANCES SECOND READING ORDINANCES. (First Reading 6/20/95) ORDINANCE NO. 42-804 Firearms Advertising An Ordinance amending Section 5.88.015 of the code of the City of Wichita, Kansas, pertaining to permit requirements and other restrictions upon the purchase and sale of firearms, handguns and assault weapons, read for the second time. Knight moved that the Ordinance be placed upon its passage and adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Yeas: Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers, Knight. ORDINANCE NO. 42-805 GO Bonds Disclosure An Ordinance creating Section 2.05.010 of the code of the City of Wichita, Kansas, establishing a master undertaking to provide ongoing disclosure in connection with General Obligation Bonds issued by the City of Wichita, Kansas for distribution in public offerings, read for the second time. Knight moved that the Ordinance be placed upon its passage and adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Yeas: Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers, Knight. ORDINANCE NO. 42-806 A 95-7 An Ordinance including and incorporating certain blocks, parcels, pieces, and tracts of land within the limits and boundaries of the City of Wichita, Kansas, and relating thereto, read for the second time. Knight moved that the Ordinance be placed upon its passage and adopted. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) Yeas: Cole, Ferris, Gale, Kamen, Rogers, Knight. A-95-7 PLANNING AGENDA V-1913 V-1913-PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST TO VACATE ACCESS CONTROL TO 21ST STREET NORTH IN AN AREA EAST OF TYLER. (District V) Agenda Report No. Staff Recommendation: Approve vacation of access control. MAPC Recommendation: Approve vacation of access control. In order to provide a separate entrance for a planned use on a portion of the involved lot, a second opening is being requested to 21st St. North. Presently, only one opening was platted for the site. Planning staff indicated some concern with the request, but Traffic Engineering indicated the additional opening should not be a detriment. At the intersection of 21st and Tyler, the applicant expanded the area protected by complete access controls, and submitted appropriate dedications. The Planning Commission also recommended that left turns not be permitted from the proposed opening; however, the Traffic Engineer, indicated the restriction was not necessary. Dedications Dedications (2) from Total Petroleum, Inc. Marvin Krout Director of Planning reviewed the Item for the City Council. The notice of hearing was published twice and no written protest had been filed. Mayor Knight Mayor Knight inquired if anyone wished to be heard on this Item and no one appeared. Council Member Ferris Council Member Ferris asked that his concerns that the opening be as far as possible from the intersection of 21st and Tyler be passed on to the appropriate people. Motion -- Ferris moved that the public hearing be closed, the vacation and dedications be approved as recommended, the Mayor be authorized to sign the Vacation Order, and a certified copy of the Order and dedications be recorded with the Register of -- carried Deeds. Motion carried 6 to 0. (Cather absent) RECESS The Council recessed to lunch and workshop session at 12:25 p.m. and reconvened at 1:22 p.m. Council Member Gale absent. ADJOURNMENT The Council Meeting adjourned at 1:22 p.m. Tom Schneider Deputy City Clerk Workshop: Sewer System Response Plan Summary Report - Kingsbury Tract Expansion to the Brooks Landfill COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS JOURNAL 159 JUNE 27, 1995 Page