WICHITA HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD MINUTES 11 DECEMBER 2006 CITY HALL, 455 N. MAIN, 10TH FLOOR-MAPD CONFERENCE ROOM 3 P.M. The regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Board was held Monday, December 11, 2006 at 3:00 P.M. in the Metropolitan Area Planning Department Conference Room, City Hall, Tenth Floor, 455 N Main, Wichita Kansas. ITEM NO. 1 ROLL CALL Members Present: Jim Guy Elena Ingle Lucio Arteaga Roberta Johnson Mim Hiesterman George Platt Members Absent: Kim Edgington Staff Present: Kathy Morgan, Senior Planner, Historic Preservation Office Barbara Hammond, Planning Analyst, Historic Preservation Office Amber Schrag, City Archaeologist Mike Gable, OCI ITEM NO. 2 ADDITIONS OR ADJUSTMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. ITEM NO. 3 REVOLVING LOAN FUND UPDATE Revolving Loan Fund – Residential $99,571 Revolving Loan Fund – Non-Residential Deferred Loan Fund – Residential $46,841 ITEM NO. 4 CORRESPONDENCE The state sites review meeting approved the six properties that were up for listing for the state national register. ITEM NO. 5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM THE 13 NOVEMBER 2006 MEETING Motion #1 made by Johnson, 2nd by Guy to approve minutes of November 13, 2006 with addition and corrections. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). ITEM NO. 6 OLD BUSINESS The buildings submitted for demolition are located within the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. In September 2005, the County hired Brenda Spencer to complete a historic building survey of the potential arena site using Kansas State Historical Society's Historic Properties Survey. The area surveyed was Douglas south to Kellogg and Market east to the Santa Fe Railroad. This survey identified buildings as either not eligible for listing or eligible for listing using a three-tier system – NR listed buildings, buildings eligible for individual listing, and buildings eligible for listing either in a district or a multiple property documentation. In order to be determined eligible for individual listing, a building must be 50 years old or older and have had no major alterations. Eligibility for listing as a contributing structure within district requires that the building be 50 years old or older and may have a few alterations, none of which can be significant. The following buildings have been determined not eligible for listing and do not provide historic context for the East Douglas NR Historic District or potentially eligible historic districts. These buildings are identified as 302-06 S. Emporia (HPC2006-00682); 305 S. St. Francis (HPC2006-00689); 317 S. St. Francis (HPC2006-00691); 337 S. St. Francis (HPC2006-00692); 600 E. Waterman (HPC2006-00693); 310 S. Commerce (HPC2006-00694); 320 S. Commerce (HPC2006-00695); 330 S. Commerce (HPC2006-00696); 622 E. Waterman (HPC2006-00697); and 326 S. Commerce (HPC2006-00702). The remaining buildings are identified as being eligible as part of district or a multiple property survey. A district listing through expansion of the East Douglas Avenue Historic District cannot be supported. Staff has had numerous conversations with the State Historic Preservation Office regarding the expansion of the East Douglas district. Because of lack of integrity and historic context of the area immediately surrounding the district, SHPO will not support the expansion of the district. With the exception of the 400 block of South Commerce, no other potential district exists within the 2005 survey area. The other buildings identified as eligible for listing would be part of a multiple property survey. Multiple property surveys require a strong common historic context as well as a high level of structural integrity in order to be eligible for listing in the National Register. Another factor in consideration of listing these structures will be if another example of the building type or the work of the architect or builder exists in better condition or may be already listed in another location within the city. Buildings identified as eligible for listing in a multiple property survey are 219 S. St. Francis (HPC2006-00685); 223 S. St. Francis (HPC2006-00686); 233 S. St. Francis (HPC2006-00687); 301 S. St. Francis (HPC2006-00688); and 315 S. St. Francis (HPC2006-00690). Although 233 S. St. Francis is designed by architect Glenn Thomas and built by Siedhoff Construction, the integrity of the building has been significantly compromised by the replacement of all original windows and doors. Since this is only a one-story building, the replacement of all of the building's windows significantly reduces its level of integrity and therefore would not qualify for listing individually. Also, better representations of both of these individuals' work are already listed in the National Register individually or within National Register historic districts within the city. Other buildings associated with Dunn Mercantile and the Dunn Family remain extant in the City. Stephanie Knebel and Ron Holt were in attendance as representatives of Sedgwick County, the applicant. 1. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00682) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 302-306 S Emporia (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Motion #2 made by Ingle, 2nd by Guy that HPB find the demolition of this structure does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). It was suggest by HPB Board members to take all (multiple property eligible) items as one vote. HPC2006- HPC2006- 00685, HPC2006-00686, HPC2006-00687, HPC2006-00688 and HPC2006-00690. In addition there was concern if property owners were properly notified, and in a timely fashion. Board members were advised of their responsibilities as Board Members, and the Bylaws were read. Board members were advised by the legal department that application(s) in question as presented were legal. Application submitted to the board was lead to believe that Sedgwick County already owned the property. This body is an advisory to the City Council and is bound ethically and legally, to follow the advice of the City Attorney office. Board members still have strong reservation that Sedgwick County interested party listed as owner/applicant vs. actual property, owner/applicant that should be reflected/listed as such. Again, the board questions how can someone else submit application for demolition of another persons property without that property owners notification, permission, or consent. The job of the HPB member is to" protect, enhance, and perpetuate historic landmarks which represent or reflect distinctive and important elements of the City's cultural, social, economic, political, archaeological and architectural history; (Bylaws, Article-I, Section 1). 2. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00685) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 219 S St. Francis (multiple property eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Cheryl and Daniel Phillippi, owners of property were present. Cheryl Phillippi made comments to the board and provide written statement, which is attached to the minutes. Motion #3 made by Johnson, 2nd by Guy to take all (multiple property eligible) items as one vote. HPC2006- 00685, HPC2006-00686, HPC2006-00687, HPC2006-00688 and HPC2006-00690. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). Motion #4 made by Johnson, 2nd by Ingle that HPB find HPC2006- HPC2006-00685, HPC2006-00686, HPC2006-00687, HPC2006-00688 and HPC2006-00690 the demolition of these structures does encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion to deny carried unanimously (6-0). 3. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00686) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 223 S St. Francis (multiple property eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. 4. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00687) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 233 S St. Francis (multiple property eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. 5. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00688) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 301 S St. Francis (multiple property eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. 6. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00689) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 305 S St. Francis (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Motion #5 made by Johnson, 2nd by Arteaga that HPB find the demolition of this structure does encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion to deny demolition carried (4-2). Opposed: Platt, Guy 7. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00690) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 315 S St. Francis (multiple property eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. 8. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00691) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 317 S St. Francis (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Motion #6 made by Ingle, 2nd by Hiesterman find that HPC2006-00691 the demolition of this structure does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). 9. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00692) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 337 S St. Francis (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Motion #7 made by Guy, 2nd by Arteaga that HPB find the demolition of this structure does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). 10. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00693) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 600 E Waterman (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. John Belford, co-owner was available for question/comments. Motion #8 made by Guy, 2nd by Hiesterman that HPB find the demolition of this structure does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). 11. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00694) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 310 S Commerce (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Keith Stevens (Trustee of the property owners) was present for questions/comments. Mr. Stevens provided a brief history. Information was also passed down from Mr. Jabara. Motion #9 made by Johnson, 2nd by Arteaga to find that the demolition of this structure does encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion to deny demolition of HPC2006-00694 carried unanimously (6-0). 12. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00695) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 320 S Commerce (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Motion #10 made by Guy, 2nd by Hiesterman that HPB find the demolition of this structure does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion carried (5-1). Opposed: Arteaga 13. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00696) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 330 S Commerce (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Motion #11 made by Ingle, 2nd by Arteaga that HPB find the demolition of this structure does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion carried (5-1). Opposed: Johnson 14. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00697) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 622 E Waterman (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Motion #12 made by Guy, 2nd by Ingle that HPB find the demolition of this structure does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion carried (3-2). Opposed: Arteaga, Johnson. Hiesterman stepped out during discussion and vote on this item. 15. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00702) Environs, East Douglas Avenue Historic District APPLICANT: Sedgwick County FOR: 326 S. Commerce (not eligible) Applicant proposes to demolish structure for arena project. Motion #13 made by Hiesterman, 2nd by Guy that HPB find the demolition of this structure does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of the East Douglas Avenue National Register Historic District. Motion carried unanimously (4-2). Opposed: Arteaga, Johnson Brief Recess ITEM NO. 7 CONSENT AGENDA A. Roof Repairs – The hailstorm in April 2006 has significantly increased the number of re-roofing applications. For properties eligible for the State Historic Income Tax Credits, the owners were notified and given the appropriate applications to file for the credits. HPC2006-703 through 715; 717 thru 720; 722 thru 728; 730 thru 736; 738 thru 744; 746; 748 thru 758; and 762 thru 767. B. Signs HPC2006-00716 2318 E Central, change text on existing sign HPC2006-00759 725 E Douglas, install two new projecting signs and an aluminum wall sign HPC2006-00760 1010 N Main, install new aluminum wall sign and logo for the Breakfast Club HPC2006-00761 707 N Waco, sign face change on existing wall sign C. Other HPC2006-00721 1010 N Market, replace gable end siding with smartboard siding, profile to match HPC2006-00737 1016 N Waco, remove existing metal awning and install overhead door in existing passenger door location Motion #14 made by Johnson, 2nd by Arteaga to approve the Consent Agenda Item(s) as presented. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). ITEM NO. 8 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS APPLICATIONS 1. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00747) Topeka/Emporia Historic District APPLICANT: Patricia Bonham FOR: 1304 N Emporia Applicant proposes to repair and paint siding, replace porch floor and ceiling, repair damage to interior walls done by fire, repair windows, and install new roof. Motion #15 made by Johnson, 2nd by Guy to approve the loan not to exceed $25,000 with the condition that all other requirements are met. Motion carried unanimously (6-0). 2. MAJOR: (HPC2006-00768) Environs, Stackman Court Apartments APPLICANT: Mike Burdine FOR: 1219 Franklin Applicant proposes to build roof structure for porch landing. Mike Burdine, owner and Russell Flippin, contractor were present for comments. Motion #16 made by Guy, 2nd by Ingle to find that the addition of the roof structure for the porch does not encroach, damage or destroy the environs of Stackman Court Apartments. Motion carried unanimously (6- 0). ITEM NO. 9 MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS 1. Amendment to Historic Preservation Ordinance regarding notice requirements. Board members felt that this issue does not address who could be the applicant. Ms. Morgan will schedule a workshop for the January 8, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. with HPB meeting to follow. ITEM NO. 10 ADJOURNMENT Motion #17 made by Hiesterman, 2nd by Johnson to adjourn at 6:07 p.m. 1